PTGUI VS AUTOPANO PRO
Stitch a panorama with Autopano Giga / Pro 4.4 Other options are detailed for Autopano Giga in its dedicated tutorial. And this often happens in multilayer panoramic photography with cameras over 10 Mo and when you stitch several photos together. The mouse allows to move in all directions but also to zoom in the image.Ĭompatible with a weight over 2 Go - PSD format, well-known of Photoshop-users, turns into PSB - B for Bold - when the weight of the panorama gets over 2 Go. Cubicles, which more spectacular shape is a virtual tour on 360×180 °, can only be visualized in a window with a determined size. Flat panoramas can be visualized like a classic panorama, meaning when necessary with the help of the horizontal navigation bar if the image is too big for the screen or in a visualization window in which we'll move inside the picture with the mouse.
PTGUI VS AUTOPANO SOFTWARE
Then, you have to know that some pieces of software will only allow you to make flat panoramas and others, flat or cubicles. You can also be attracted to one panoramic piece of software but because of your lens and its distortions, have to choose a different panorama software, more powerful in this case.įirstly, the aim of this tutorial is to introduce a few pieces of software that seem to be reference and I'll complete that list as my reviews go along.
Each will have its favorite because lots of stitching pieces of software, once mastered, are amazingly efficient. There are many of them and I imagine that most of you already have an opinion on the subject. There you'll find simple pieces of advice to implement to stitch beautiful panoramas, choose your software, your hardware. In this page, I'll share with you my experience of the qualities of each of them after making a non-exhaustive list.Ī new part of this guide is now dedicated to you. They can't thus be considered professional, or in any case, top-range. Hemifisheye is really a unique projection.Panoramic photography and stitching pieces of software are now very numerous, but few offer stitching quality, flexibility of use, productivity. It is also great for architecture.Īnyway: the end result is better than any of the projections in PTgui. I remove that FE effect in Adobe Elements with the "HemiFisheye" plugin that is the worlds best filter at defishing: it leaves peoples shape and faces intact even near the edges. The latter produces a panorama (usually at most 4 - 5 shots) with a heavy fish eye effect. Recently I have found that when I stitch a row of format-filling, portrait orientation fisheye images (sigma 15mm F2.8 on Nikon D800) I get a better result of the top of trees by exporting using the "full Frame Fisheye" projection: The tops of trees curve a lot away when using Mercator - and much less when using"Full frame fisheye" projection. I must admit I have not explored how all these work - I just use the "mask" tool to shift seams if I do not like their initial, default placement.
PTGUI VS AUTOPANO PLUS
PTgui has a lot of push-buttons for various projections plus you can use the freeware enblend, smartblend and autopana as plugins - the last they think at PTgui is obsolete now - I don't know why.Īlso the Panoramatools application "PTOptimizer" and the "PTstitcherNG" application.
PTGUI VS AUTOPANO FULL
24mm on full frame, it wasn't wide enough. I've put some images of West Wycombe church and the final stitch on my flickr page and I'd be interested how other programs stitch them, but I was staggered when I first did this. The other interesting thing it does is to take pictures of buildings that seem undo-able and sorts them out. I've never looked further than AP, so cannot say about the others but APP gives you a push button choice of projection so you can chose what looks best.
0 kommentar(er)
